Write English That Sounds Right — Not Just Correct

Building Subject, Verb, and Object Sentences

Write correct Subject + Verb, Subject + Verb + Object, and Subject + Verb + Complement sentences from scratch — the same three shapes Lesson 1 taught you to find while reading.

Wrapping a Core Sentence in Modifiers

Write a short core sentence, then deliberately wrap it in adjectives, adverbs, and prepositional phrases — building the same long-sentence shape Lesson 2 teaches you to take apart.

Writing Noun Phrases and Verb Phrases as Units

Build a noun phrase around a head noun and a verb phrase around a main verb, including a helping verb and a passive form — producing the same chunks Lesson 3 teaches you to spot while reading.

Joining a Main Clause to a Dependent Clause

Write sentences that pair a main clause with a reason, time, condition, or contrast clause — producing the exact clause relationships Lesson 4 teaches you to recognize while reading.

Writing Accurately About Time

Choose Present Simple, Past Simple, Present Perfect, or Future correctly for a real sequence of events — putting Lesson 5's timeline to work instead of just reading it off someone else's sentence.

Using Articles Correctly

Choose between a, an, the, and no article at all with confidence — the same new-vs-known distinction Lesson 6 teaches you to read, now applied to your own writing.

Describing a Relationship With a Preposition

Write sentences that use of, in, for, by, and through to build a real relationship between two ideas — producing the exact connections Lesson 7 teaches you to read as an author's logic, not a word to translate.

Connecting Two Ideas With a Conjunction

Join two full sentences with and, but, because, and so — then upgrade one pair into its more formal cousin, however or therefore — the logical connectors Lesson 8 teaches you to read as an author's actual argument.

Describing With Precise Degree and Certainty

Write descriptions that use adverbs of degree and certainty on purpose — extremely, relatively, probably — so your own writing carries exactly the strength of claim you intend, the way Lesson 9 teaches you to read an author's.

Referring Back With a Pronoun

Write two or more sentences that use a pronoun to refer back to something already named — building the same reference chain Lesson 10 teaches you to trace while reading, instead of repeating the same noun every time.

Combining Sentences with Relative Clauses

Write a short connected paragraph about a team or workplace, using who, which, that, and whose to merge choppy sentence pairs into fluent ones — each clause attached to exactly the noun it describes.

Writing Hypothetical Sentences

Write sentences about unreal, hypothetical situations using the correct conditional form — a past-tense verb after 'if' that means possibility, not past time.

Choosing Active or Passive to Control a Sentence's Focus

Write the same event twice — once in active voice, once in passive — and decide, on purpose, which noun deserves to open the sentence.

Writing With Gerunds and Infinitives

Write your own sentences using a gerund as a subject, a verb + infinitive pattern, and a preposition + gerund — the exact three shapes Lesson 14 taught you to recognise.

Compressing a Clause Into a Participle Phrase

Take two full sentences and compress the second one into a participle phrase describing a noun in the first — the exact compression Lesson 15 taught you to expand back.

Attributing a Claim With a That-Clause

Write a sentence that names a source, chooses a reporting verb of the right strength, and states a claim in a that-clause — the exact structure Lesson 16 taught you to take apart when reading.

Writing a Properly Hedged Claim

Write the same claim at three different strengths — flat fact, cautious possibility, and heavily hedged — choosing the modal or hedging phrase that matches exactly how confident the evidence allows you to be.

Building a Nominalized Sentence

Compress two plain sentences into one dense, formal sentence built around a nominalization like 'implementation' or 'reduction' — the exact compression Lesson 18 taught you to reverse when reading.

Writing a Parallel List and a Comparison

Write one sentence listing three matching items in the same grammatical form, and one sentence comparing two things accurately — including the easily-missed negative 'not as...as.'

Writing a Mini-Paragraph With Discourse Markers

Write a short claim-reason-example-conclusion paragraph, signposted with discourse markers like 'because,' 'for example,' and 'therefore' — the exact architecture Lesson 20 taught you to read.

Writing a Well-Hedged Inference

Write a fact and a reasonable inference built on it, hedged with exactly the right strength — neither stated as certain fact nor stretched into unsupported speculation.

Building a Dense Noun Phrase

Compress three plain sentences into one professional sentence built around 'the extent to which,' 'the ability of X to Y,' or 'the development of' — the exact patterns Lesson 22 taught you to decode, now built from scratch.

Threading One Idea Through a Paragraph

Write four connected sentences about one topic without repeating the same noun twice — using a pronoun, a this/these summary phrase, and a synonym to keep the paragraph's reference chain alive.

Matching Causal Language to the Evidence

Write a cause-and-effect sentence with exactly the right strength of causal verb — caused, contributed to, or is associated with — matched to how much the evidence actually supports.

Choosing What Comes First

Rewrite one sentence twice, each time putting a different piece of information in the spotlight — using a cleft structure or passive voice to control what the reader notices first.

Building a Claim-Reason-Evidence Argument

Write a short argumentative paragraph with a claim, a reason, and evidence that actually earns the claim — the writing side of Lesson 26's argument skeleton.

Writing a Concession, Then Your Real Point

Write a sentence that concedes a fair point with although or despite, then pushes on to what you actually mean — the writing side of Lesson 27's comparison and concession patterns.

Calibrating Certainty in a Written Claim

Write a short paragraph reporting a finding with hedging language that matches the evidence exactly — the writing side of Lesson 28's modality and stance skills.

Naming a Mechanism and an Alternative Explanation

Write a causal claim that explains how the cause produces the effect, then honestly name one alternative explanation you haven't ruled out — the writing side of Lesson 29's causal reasoning skills.

Separating Data From Interpretation in Writing

Write a paragraph that states an observation, then clearly separates it from what you think it means and how far that meaning can travel — the writing side of Lesson 30's evidence and interpretation skills.

Stating an Argument's Hidden Assumption

Write a short argument, then name the unstated premise it secretly depends on and test whether it survives being questioned — the writing side of Lesson 31's assumption-finding skills.

Testing a Causal Claim With a Counterfactual

Write a causal claim, then write the counterfactual question that actually tests it — the writing side of Lesson 32's counterfactual reasoning skills.

Writing an Argument That Avoids a Named Fallacy

Write a short argument that deliberately avoids a specific logical fallacy, and explain exactly how it does so — the writing side of Lesson 33's argument evaluation and fallacy skills.

Writing a Concession-Then-Rebuttal Passage With Purpose

Write a short passage using the concession-then-rebuttal structure, then name the persuasive purpose your own word choices were built to serve — the writing side of Lesson 34's rhetorical structure skills.

Writing the Same Fact in Two Different Tones

Write two short paragraphs reporting the same fact in a neutral tone and then a skeptical tone, without changing the underlying evidence — the writing side of Lesson 35's tone, bias, and objectivity skills.

Writing a Word Into Two Different Meanings

Write two short passages that use the same word in two genuinely different senses, and build the context that makes each meaning unmistakable — the writer's side of the ambiguity-resolution skill Lesson 36 taught for reading.

Compressing Two Ideas Into One Sentence

Use an appositive and negative inversion to pack two plain sentences into one dense, correctly punctuated academic sentence — the writer's side of the unpacking skill Lesson 37 taught for reading.

Choosing the Exact Connector

Write a short paragraph that moves through claim, contrast, qualification, and conclusion using four precisely chosen connectors — not just any near-synonym, but the one that says exactly what Lesson 38 taught you to mean.

Writing Without Repeating Yourself

Write a short connected paragraph that never repeats the same noun twice, using pronouns, demonstratives, substitute words, and ellipsis — the writer's side of the cohesion toolkit Lesson 39 taught for reading.

Writing a Precisely Scoped Sentence

Write three sentences that control exactly what 'only,' a qualified negative, and a quantifier each attach to — precision Lesson 40 taught you to demand when reading, now demanded of your own writing.

Unpacking a Dense Sentence Into Plain English

Write one dense, nominalization-heavy academic sentence, then paraphrase it into two or three plain sentences without losing its hedges — the exact reverse-engineering skill Lesson 41 taught for reading, done as a writing exercise both ways.

Writing One Sentence With Three Clauses

Build one sentence with a main clause, a correctly attached subordinate clause, and a relative clause embedded inside it — the writer's side of the clause-hierarchy skill Lesson 42 taught for reading.

Writing a Paragraph That Flows

Write a short academic paragraph where each sentence hands its new information to the next as the following sentence's given topic — the writer's side of the given-to-new flow Lesson 43 taught for reading.

Building a Paragraph's Argument

Write a paragraph that states a claim, supports it with real evidence rather than a single anecdote, and closes with a qualification — then compress the whole thing to one sentence without losing the hedge, scope, or qualification, exactly the skill Lesson 44 taught for reading.

Writing in Academic Chunks

Write a short academic paragraph using a causal-family verb, a stance bundle, and a formal lexical bundle correctly and deliberately — producing the fixed word-groups Lesson 45 taught you to recognise instantly when reading.

Writing at Two Speeds

Write a short paragraph with deliberate pacing — most of it plain context, one sentence carrying the real claim — the same layered structure Lesson 46 taught you to spot when reading.

Labeling a Paragraph's Argument

Write a five-sentence paragraph where every sentence has a distinct, labeled job — context, claim, evidence, qualification, conclusion — the writer's-side mirror of Lesson 47's reading question.

Outlining a Chapter Before You Write It

Write a title and three section headings with a one-line job description for each — the writer's-side mirror of Lesson 48's chapter-preview reading strategy.

Stating Your Own Thesis

Write a short paragraph that states an overall position and backs it with two or three supporting points — the writer's-side mirror of Lesson 49's book-level thesis reading.

Writing "Although" Sentences

Write concession-then-claim sentences directly in English, without a Bangla intermediate step — the writer's-side mirror of Lesson 50's structure-to-meaning reading skill.

Tracing an Argument Chain in Writing

Write a paragraph that connects several ideas into one argument chain — each link explicitly following from the one before it, the way Lesson 51 taught you to trace an author's reasoning.

Defining a Concept Precisely

Write a definition that does more than state a category — say what the concept is, what it is not, and how it differs from something easily confused with it, the way Lesson 52 taught you to read a definition.

Explaining a Technical Term for a Non-Expert Reader

Write a short passage that uses one piece of domain-specific vocabulary correctly and explains it in context, so a reader outside your field can follow it without a dictionary — the writing side of Lesson 53's reading strategy.

Writing a Technical Process

Describe a system or workflow with a trigger, ordered stages, one branch or exception, and a final state — the writing side of the process-diagram reading strategy Lesson 54 taught.

Writing About Data Precisely

Turn a number into a sentence that says what it measures, what it's compared with, and what conclusion it actually supports — the writing side of the data-reading strategy Lesson 55 taught.

Building a Quantitative Argument

Use a number as genuine support for a claim rather than decoration for one — stating what changed, what it's compared with, and what a confound stops you from concluding, the writing side of Lesson 56's data-argument framework.

Defining and Classifying a Concept

Build a category tree with one consistent criterion instead of a vague mixed list — the writing side of the definition-and-classification reading strategy Lesson 57 taught.

Explaining a Mechanism

Show not just what happens, but exactly how a cause produces its effect — naming the intermediate steps with by/through/via, the writing side of Lesson 58's mechanism-reading strategy.

Using an Example as Evidence

Show exactly what one case proves, and be honest about what it doesn't — the writing side of Lesson 59's example-versus-evidence reading strategy.

Comparing Along a Named Dimension

Say exactly what respect two things are being compared in, instead of a bare 'better' — the writing side of Lesson 60's comparison-dimension reading strategy.

Writing a Precise Conceptual Distinction

Write a short passage that draws the exact boundary between two familiar-sounding terms — the way Lesson 61 taught you to read one.

Narrating Change Over Time

Write a short passage that traces a process or development through time — separating clean sequence from a genuine causal claim, the way Lesson 62 taught you to read one.

Writing a Complete Problem-Solution Chain

Write a passage that traces a problem to its root cause, a solution, and its trade-offs — the full chain Lesson 63 taught you to reconstruct when reading.

Writing a Recommendation with the Right Modal

Write a short policy or recommendation passage using should, must, may, and could precisely — the modal system Lesson 64 taught you to read.

Writing an Evaluation with a Named Criterion

Write a comparison that names its criterion before judging — never calling something 'better' without saying better at what, the way Lesson 65 taught you to read.

Writing a Calibrated Risk Statement

Write a forecast or risk statement that hedges exactly as strongly as the evidence allows — no more, no less — the discipline Lesson 66 taught you to read.

Writing a Conditional Rule

Write a rule using if, only if, and if and only if for exactly the logical direction you mean — the system Lesson 67 taught you to read.

Writing a Rule with a Genuine Exception

Write a rule paragraph that keeps an exception, a limitation, and a precaution clearly separate — the distinctions Lesson 68 taught you to read.

Writing a Concession That Blocks a Wrong Conclusion

Write a paragraph that concedes a point, then uses 'this does not mean' to stop the reader from over-generalising — the pattern Lesson 69 taught you to read.

Writing for Emphasis

Use 'not only... but also' and a cleft sentence to place the real point exactly where you want it — the focus tools Lesson 70 taught you to read.

Narrowing a Claim Across a Paragraph

Open with a broad claim, then narrow it into a precise, qualified final position across four sentences — the same claim-evolution shape Lesson 71 taught you to track as a reader.

Naming the Parts of an Argument

Write a short argument, then label its premise, its evidence, its inference, and its conclusion explicitly — the production side of Lesson 72's argument-structure reading skill.

Writing an Argument With a Hidden Assumption

Write an argument that leaves a real gap between evidence and conclusion, then name the assumption that quietly bridges it — the production side of Lesson 73's gap-finding skill.

Judging Whether Evidence Is Enough

Write a short case and judge, explicitly, whether its evidence is sufficient for the conclusion it's asked to support — the production side of Lesson 74's evidence-sufficiency skill.

Comparing Two Sources

Write the same claim as reported by two different sources, then judge in writing which is more trustworthy and why — the production side of Lesson 75's source-quality skill.

Framing the Same Fact Two Ways

Write one true fact as two different sentences — one neutral, one slanted — using only selection and word choice, never a lie, and label which is which. The production side of Lesson 76's framing-detection skill.

Fact, Interpretation, or Opinion?

Write three sentences about the same situation — one fact, one interpretation, one opinion — and label each correctly. The production side of Lesson 77's reasoning-layers skill.

Naming a Sentence's Job

Write two sentences that each perform a different rhetorical job in a paragraph — supporting a claim, then conceding a limitation — and label each sentence's function. The production side of Lesson 78's rhetorical-function skill.

Building a Paragraph That Leans on the One Before

Write two connected paragraphs where the second explicitly picks up something from the first and performs a new job — the production side of Lesson 79's paragraph-connection skill.

Compressing a Chapter Into One Question

Write a short abstract that reduces several connected points into a single central question and its answer — the production side of Lesson 80's chapter-architecture skill.

Writing a Qualified Book Thesis

Compress a short book description down to one qualified, defensible thesis sentence — the writing mirror of Lesson 81's book-mapping skill.

Tracking a Concept's Meaning

Write a paragraph that names, precisely, how a single word's meaning expanded, narrowed, or was reframed across a short passage — the writing mirror of Lesson 82's concept-tracking skill.

Tracking a Claim's Evolution

Write a paragraph tracking what changed about a claim across a passage — and whether that change is legitimate refinement or genuine contradiction — the writing mirror of Lesson 83.

Evaluating an Argument

Write a paragraph judging whether an author has actually earned their conclusion, using a three-level evaluation and calibrated claim language — the writing mirror of Lesson 84.

Calibrating a Claim to Its Evidence

Write a claim that matches exactly the strength of the evidence behind it, and catch the common error of silently strengthening a hedged claim — the writing mirror of Lesson 85.

Synthesizing Two Claims Into One Paragraph

Write one paragraph that combines two sources with different findings into a single, honest synthesis — without silently erasing either one's hedges or their disagreement — the production side of Lesson 86's synthesis skill.

Writing a Paragraph With One Main Idea and Real Support

Write a short paragraph with one clear main-idea sentence and two to three genuinely supporting sentences, not tangents — the production side of Lesson 87's information-hierarchy skill, and the final writing task in this course so far.